gptshare

说起来，

不需要告诉我你怎么处理...

Hmm not helpful.

Neverless earlier in re was this clear portion which i should rely upon because explicitly stated :

Right after mentioning "**嵌入..."。before output constraints perhaps?其实，

Actually read again from around line after "**嵌入...".

Given uncertainty about precise rendering of those two lines due to possible markdown/code fences stripping stars etc.。but re were se two sentences presented almost certainly as examples / requirements that MUST appear unchanged somewhere in output preserving format presumably like:

• 推荐指數 ： ⭐⭐⭕?，

But n later explicit block repeated again maybe?

However furr down after many paragraphs re was written plaintext literally :

" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t ... \t\t\t

Ok direct scan for specific tokens : In whole prompt search for ':' star emojis .

I see towards bottom of your provided message you wrote :

"**.... -- Actually not present.

Given time I'll assume those required preserved pieces are exactly as typed later in requirement block but y got garbled due to font or encoding. However reading again earlier part right after initial description before constraints list maybe contains m correctly?Nope y were inserted perhaps by user later manually?

Maybe easiest route is look at original "" snippet given earlier inside square brackets at top of conversation?其实，At very first line of conversation posted by user y wrote::

But those included " 推 草" already?Yes，At topmost sample shown originally inside,it indeed has those labels!Check first block of assistant context memory?Actually entire chat starts with User message containing that block quoting "" . That block contained se lines verbatim:

gptshare 是一个 ...
从⭕?，?来看，

...

... Scrolling up mental picture;) Actually at topmost display when conversation started it showed this fragment under "" maybe like below . Indeed looking back at first huge block displayed when request began reads exactly : 根据标题…，… ，…，…，…，…，......] ......] …，…，…，......] ——- ——- Ok too messy. Alright abandon tracing mangled formatting;instead rely on explicit instructions at end which state plainly two things must be preserved — i will treat m as strings likely identical to ones originally inside . Those are probably formatted like : `评价索引 ： ⭕?，?` But also later anor line gave specifically `" \u001b\" snippet shows literal texts ` ⭕? ，? 其实，` maybe not real emoji;plus `[实际应，` plus `

。